Title: The Portrait of a Lady Author: Henry James Published: 1880-81 in Atlantic Monthly and Macmillan Magazine Amazon Goodreads Synopsis: In this portrait of a "young woman affronting her destiny," Henry James created one of his most magnificent heroines, and a story of intense poignancy. When Isabel Archer, a beautiful, spirited American, is brought to Europe by her wealthy aunt, it is expected that she will soon marry. But Isabel, resolved to enjoy her freedom, does not hesitate to turn down two eligible suitors. Then she finds herself irresistibly drawn to the charming and cultivated Gilbert Osmond. Isabel, however, soon discovers the cruelty and stifling darkness beneath Gilbert's civilized veneer. |
If you are looking for a classic romance in the vein of Jane Austen, Louisa May Alcott, Charlotte Bronte, and George Eliot you have come to the wrong place. Be warned, there are no happy couples here. This book is for the cold-hearted cynic inside of you. Henry James is not a romantic and The Portrait of a Lady is more of a Victorian satire, a romantic parody, if you will.
First we have our main character Isabel Archer, a young woman from Albany, New York who moves in with her expatriate relatives living in England. Her male relatives take an instant liking to her, both of them being ill, and when her uncle dies he leaves the bulk of his fortune to Isabel because of her cousin Ralph’s urging. She is beautiful, charming, and now wealthy; everything a girl of the time would want to be. She has a trail of suitors all of whom she rejects believing she wants to see the world and maintain her independence. Then a friend of the family, Madame Merle, introduces her to the charming but poor Gilbert Osmond and his adorable daughter Pansy. She falls head-over-heels and agrees to marry him. But unlike most women in these classic romances things take a turn for the worse as soon as she gets married.
One thing you have to know about this book is that the writing style that Henry James uses to craft this story is incredibly unique. It is told in third-person omniscient and many times this narrator chooses to speak directly to the reader, informing them of what the characters are doing and why they are doing them. And we not only learn of Isabel and her goings on but also Osmond, Madame Merle, and many other characters. Because of this extra knowledge we get a lot of dramatic irony and our opinions of many characters are different than those of Isabel based on our privileged information. It adds a completely new dimension to the story and we spend a lot of the book seeing Isabel work out the information we learned 300 pages previously. And like most classics, James writing is incredibly poetic and his prose is incredible.
The book is very character-driven as much of the plot is devoted to the seemingly mundane social visits that the characters make to one another. Many moments that you would think are important to the story are glossed over, or not mentioned at all. For example we never see Isabel’s wedding. She accepts Osmond’s proposal and then we skip ahead a year. But the complicatedness of the characters and their lives makes the book interesting. There is a lot of scheming and plotting, and I was incredibly surprised by a crazy plot twist at the end of the book.
James seems to be making a social commentary in this book. First, money doesn’t bring you happiness and neither can marriage. For Isabel when she inherits a small fortune it creates problems for her that she never expected, and when she finally accepts a marriage proposal things turn really bad. She is married for love, wealthy, and now miserable. Finally, and most importantly, James is making a statement about love. In most of these classic novels there is the idea of marry for love, maybe you’ll be poor but at least you’ll be happy. This is really not the case in The Portrait of a Lady. To me James seems to be saying, you don’t really know what love and you’re confusing lust for love. Isabel thinks she wants to marry for love and wants to be treated as an equal but she turns down more than one perfectly good proposal out of pure stubbornness. She is very stubborn character on the whole: stubborn, headstrong, and reckless. She doesn’t think about what is best for herself before making a decision, she just makes it. But I do give her a lot of respect for sticking with her decisions despite the fact that she knows they were the wrong thing to do when she looks back on them.
I give The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James an 8 out of 10
Now don’t get me wrong. I love classic romances where love overcomes all obstacles. I’m not saying those are bad novels in any but The Portrait of a Lady was incredibly refreshing. This book was a tremendous social commentary and really enjoyable. It completely changed the way I view literary couples and I will never look at classics the same way. It was the perfect anti-love story for February. If you are looking for a new spin on classics or a cynical take on romance then I definitely recommend this book.
If you’ve read it and have thoughts leave me a comment and of course HAPPY READING!
I keep meaning to read this book. I loved Washington Square, which is another fantastic but depressing read.
ReplyDelete"If you are looking for a classic romance in the vein of Jane Austen, Louisa May Alcott, Charlotte Bronte, and George Eliot you have come to the wrong place. Be warned, there are no happy couples here."
ReplyDeleteI may tolerate the mention of Jane Austen (who I don't think is very romantic), but George Eliot definitely doesn't belong there. Her novels don't deal with romance and happy couples- in fact, her Middlemarch and Daniel Deronda inspired The Portrait of a Lady. Compare Isabel Archer to Dorothea Brooke and Gwendolen Harleth. Compare the bad marriages.
"She falls head-over-heels and agrees to marry him. But unlike most women in these classic romances things take a turn for the worse as soon as she gets married."
I believe it's more common than you think it is, when you look beyond the authors you mentioned (except for George Eliot, you can find that in George Eliot). That is called the marriage plot, and most of the time the marriage in the marriage plot is a bad one (because "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way").
"One thing you have to know about this book is that the writing style that Henry James uses to craft this story is incredibly unique. It is told in third-person omniscient and many times this narrator chooses to speak directly to the reader, informing them of what the characters are doing and why they are doing them. And we not only learn of Isabel and her goings on but also Osmond, Madame Merle, and many other characters. Because of this extra knowledge we get a lot of dramatic irony and our opinions of many characters are different than those of Isabel based on our privileged information. It adds a completely new dimension to the story and we spend a lot of the book seeing Isabel work out the information we learned 300 pages previously."
If the next sentences are meant to elaborate on the uniqueness of James's style, that isn't unique at all.
"Finally, and most importantly, James is making a statement about love. In most of these classic novels there is the idea of marry for love, maybe you’ll be poor but at least you’ll be happy. This is really not the case in The Portrait of a Lady. To me James seems to be saying, you don’t really know what love and you’re confusing lust for love. Isabel thinks she wants to marry for love and wants to be treated as an equal but she turns down more than one perfectly good proposal out of pure stubbornness."
ReplyDelete1st, I don't think classic novels advocate the idea of marrying only for love. Take Charlotte Bronte, for example, in Jane Eyre Jane loves Rochester but morality is more important- she doesn't accept bigamy and the fact that he has deceived her. Less romantic and more realistic than Charlotte Bronte, Jane Austen always takes money into consideration- look at Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice and Emma especially, income matters; in Persuasion, Anne listens to others and doesn't accept Wentworth when he's poor; in Mansfield Park, we see Mrs Price as an example of someone marrying for only love and becoming poor and not being truly happy. Jane Austen doesn't advocate following one's passion and forget prudence and duties either- look at Marianne Dashwood, Lydia Bennet, Maria Bertram, etc. She stresses on love, compatibility, understanding and mutual respect. Also, in Mansfield Park we find her shattering the bad boy ideal, when her heroine Fanny declines a charming man who toys with women's feelings.
2nd, I don't know what I'll think when finishing the book, but from what I know, Isabel's tragedy is not due to her marrying for love.
"The Portrait of a Lady was incredibly refreshing. This book was a tremendous social commentary and really enjoyable. It completely changed the way I view literary couples and I will never look at classics the same way. It was the perfect anti-love story for February."
You should read Anna Karenina, if you haven't. Tolstoy makes a distinction between 2 kinds of love- romantic love and intimate love. And he's the greatest of all novelists, a painter, a psychologist.